It is similar to the GNU General Public Licensegiving readers the rights to copy, redistribute, and modify except for "invariant sections" a work and requires all copies and derivatives to be available under the same license. Copies may also be sold commercially, but, if produced in larger quantities greater thanthe original document or incontri mir code must be made available to the work's recipient. The Incontri mir was designed for manualstextbooks, other reference and instructional materials, and documentation which often accompanies GNU incontri mir. However, it can be used for any text-based work, regardless of subject matter. The current state of the license is version 1. Material licensed incontri mir the current version of the license can be used for any purpose, as long as the use meets certain conditions. The license explicitly separates any kind of "Document" from "Secondary Sections", which may not be integrated with the Document, but exist as front-matter materials or appendices. Secondary sections can contain information regarding the author's or publisher's relationship to the subject matter, but not any subject matter itself. While the Document itself is wholly editable, and is essentially covered by a license equivalent to but mutually incompatible with the GNU General Public Licensesome of the secondary sections have various restrictions designed primarily incontri mir deal with proper attribution to previous authors. Specifically, the authors of prior versions have to be acknowledged and certain incontri mir sections" specified by the original author and dealing with his or her relationship to the subject matter may not be changed. If the material is modified, its title has to be changed unless the prior authors give permission to retain the title. The license also has provisions for the handling of front-cover and back-cover texts of books, as well as for "History", "Acknowledgements", "Dedications" and "Endorsements" sections. These features were added in part to make the license more financially attractive to commercial publishers of software documentation, some of whom were consulted during the drafting of the GFDL. The GFDL requires the ability to "copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially" and therefore is incompatible with material that excludes commercial re-use.уже с нами. Присоединяйтесь!
There have currently been no cases involving the GFDL in a court of law, although its sister license for software, the GNU General Public License , has been successfully enforced in such a setting. This means that a licensee is not allowed to save document copies "made" in a proprietary file format or using encryption. One example of such liberal and commercial fair use is parody. FSF is not Creative Commons: This list is incomplete ; you can help by expanding it. The current state of the license is version 1. Worse, the same is required for the standalone use of just one for example, Wikipedia image. However, at the request of the Wikimedia Foundation ,  version 1. You may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies you make or distribute. This means that if a licensee prints out a copy of an article whose text is covered under the GNU FDL, he or she must also include a copyright notice and a physical printout of the GNU FDL, which is a significantly large document in itself. The grand unified field theory still escapes us until the document licences too are just additional permissions on top of GPL. Archived from the original on The goal of invariant sections, ever since the 80s when we first made the GNU Manifesto an invariant section in the Emacs Manual, was to make sure they could not be removed.